|

|
ROMEO ORTEGA
Laboratoire des Signaux et
Systèmes
LSS/CNRS/Supélec
Plateau de Moulon
91192 Gif Sur Yvette Cedex
France |
|
Passivity-Based
Control of Physical Systems: Control by Interconnection
and
State-Feedback Laws (6 hours)
PDF-file
As vividly illustrated by the
quintessential Watt's governor a natural procedure to modify the
behavior of a dynamical system is to interconnect it with another
dynamical system. Examples of this approach abound in modern high-performance
practical applications and are proven to be very robust and reliable.
These include, among many others, mechanical suspension and flapper
systems, flotation devices, damping windings and impedance matching
filters in electrical systems. (It may be even argued that biological
and medical applications, of great current interest, are best studied
invokinginterconnection principles instead of simplistic causeeffect
preconceptions.)
Adopting the interconnection
perspective allows us to formulate the control problem in terms of the
physical properties of the systems like energy-shaping and damping
injection, it furthermore underscores the role of interconnection to
achieve these objectives. This should be contrasted with the classical
actuator-plant-sensor paradigm that leads to a signal-processing view of
control in which the systems physical properties are di±cult to
incorporate.
In our previous works we have proposed
a mathematical framework to design controllers using the aforementioned
systems interconnection perspective that we called Control by
Interconnection (CbI). Towards this end we restricted ourselves to
systems described by Port-Hamiltonian (PH) models, which suitably
describe the dynamics of many physical processes, and where the
importance of the energy function, the interconnection pattern and the
dissipation of the system is highlighted. In CbI the controller is
another PH system connected to the plant (through a power-preserving
interconnection) to add up their energy functions. In spite of the
conceptual appeal of formulating the control problem as the interaction
of dynamical systems, the current version of CbI imposes a severe
restriction on the plant dissipation structure that stymies its
practical application.
The purpose of this course is to
propose some extensions to the CbI method to make it more widely
applicable|in particular, to overcome the dissipation obstacle [1].
Furthermore, we establish the connections between CbI and Standard
PassivityBased Control (PBC). Standard PBC, where energy shaping is
achieved via static (or dynamic) state feedback, is one of the most
successful controller design techniques [2] [3]. However, the control
law is usually derived either from an uninspiring and non-intuitive "passive
output generation" viewpoint or from an, equally restrictive, model
matching perspective-where a quadratic storage function is assigned to
the error dynamics. We prove in this talk that Standard PBC is obtained
restricting CbI to a suitable subset of the state space|providing a nice
geometric interpretation to Standard PBC.
The application of the methods is
illustrated with the following practical examples: electromechanical
systems (double-fed induction machines, synchronous motors and micro-electromechanical
systems), power system stabilizers, switched power converters and
underactuated mechanical systems.
References
[1] R. Ortega, A. van der Schaft, F.
Casta~nos and A. Astolfi, Control by state{modulated interconnection of
port{Hamiltonian systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., Vol. 53, No. 11,
pp. 2527{2542, 2008.
[2] R. Ortega, A. Loria, P. J. Nicklasson
and H. Sira{Ramirez, Passivity-Based Control of Euler{Lagrange Systems,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Communications and Control Engineering, 1998.
[3] A. Astolfi, D. Karagiannis and R.
Ortega, Nonlinear and Adaptive Control with Applications,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Communications and Control Engineering, 2007. |